Citizendium Invites You To Their Write-A-Thon
I’ve been contributing articles and/or editing for Wikipedia since last July, by helping expand articles, providing relevant citable sources, and responding to the occasional call for help. Time isn’t on my side when it comes to editing for free, but there are those times when a Wikipedia diversion provides a needed boost for the editor within.
Soon after joining Wikipedia, I also registered for Citizendium, another
wiki-style site which launched in early 2007. Founded by the same person who started Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, Citizendium is small potatoes compared to Wikipedia.
It is also a lot more accurate than Wikipedia, in my opinion.
Yes, Sanger feels the same way that I do — Wikipedia’s purity has been sullied by its anonymity, something Citizendium has corrected by requiring contributors to disclose who they are. With Wikipedia, there isn’t anything more annoying than some cyber-troll coming along and mashing up your contributions. Sure, you can reverse the vandalism and dispute changes, but there are some article topics which seem to be dominated by editors with an agenda to uphold.
No, I haven’t done anything with my Citizendium membership, but that is likely to change. The first Wednesdays of the month is Citizendium’s “Write-A-Thon” day where members are encouraged to contribute a new article (even if just a stub) or provide a substantive edit to a current article. By participating you’ll contribute to a growing and respectful resource that is controlled by its members, not by a foundation, private entity, or public owners.
To get a feel for Citizendium, check out their blog. If you have a wee bit of extra time during the month, then stop by and lend a hand. I won’t be able to participate in this month’s “Write-A-Thon” which is today, but I plan on offering some assistance in the near future.

The anonymity is what puts me off wiki. I see hidden spammy links that do not get deleted while my content get deleted 10 secs after posting by some other surfer…
DLR, you got that right. I’ve dealt with anonymous editors who seek to trash an article, while disclosing who I am. Some of the banter is highly unproductive and agenda driven.
I pick my battles on Wikipedia and have had more success than failures. Then again, I mostly massage text and correct broken links as I find them.
I’ve only submitted one article in the past year!