Mitt Romney’s Plan For Detroit
While at the Los Angeles Auto Show last week, I managed to hear plenty about the state of the auto industry. You couldn’t escape it: mostly every product introduction was prefaced by one or more references to the challenges facing the industry. I managed to tune some of that out simply because time was of the essence and I wanted to take in as much as I could in two short, but very packed days on the floor.
On Wednesday, which was the first of the two press days, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, had an op-ed piece published in The New York Times. I didn’t hear about it until late Friday and got to read what the one time candidate for this year’s Republican presidential nomination had to say over the weekend. After reading his article, Let Detroit Go Bankrupt, I found myself in full agreement with him.
Quite frankly, the money that Detroit is seeking from the US government will only put off the inevitable. GM, for one, says that they are bleeding cash at a rate of two billion dollars per month. I’ve heard of various numbers floated for the amount General Motors wants to borrow, but ten billion dollars is one figure that has come up frequently.
So, my question is this: what happens in five months time when GM loses another ten billion dollars? Will that money be gone and will GM come back to the federal government with their hands held out?
Like Romney, I am in agreement that drastic steps must be taken and the sooner they are completed, the better the U.S. auto industry will be. I’m convinced that the only solution for all three automakers is to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection which would force each company to reorganize. In addition, the current management structure needs to be changed and some if not all of the following should take place:
General Motors – Excess brands should be closed down with Cadillac and Chevrolet left as the bookends for the company. Buick can stay as a Chinese only brand, but there isn’t any reason to maintain the rest. Give Cadillac the Buick Enclave (please kill the Escalade) and let Chevrolet have the Pontiac G8 (Impala) and G8SP (which should be promptly renamed the El Camino). The Saturn VUE would move to Chevrolet and most likely everything else would be allowed to die.
Ford — Say good-bye to Mercury, a brand that hasn’t seen an original product in more than a decade. Keep Volvo as long as owning the brand benefits the rest of the company, particularly Lincoln which needs to be rejuvenated or killed off. I’d almost rather see Volvo live on and Lincoln smoked if it came down to one of the two surviving.
Chrysler — There is no reason for this company to be in business. Period. Jeep should be sold, hopefully a revived GM would buy it. Sell the Dodge Ram to Nissan, the minivans can go to either Ford or GM, and maybe Lotus would be interested in the Viper. The Challenger and everyone else would be retired.
It is inevitable that the Big 3 will not carry on for much longer, so why delay what is bound to happen? I think most Americans agree that loans to General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler will not be enough to guarantee that the U.S. auto industry will come out of this stronger.
Like the airline industry, which has seen its own historic restructuring post bankruptcy, the U.S. auto industry can do the same. Market share will go to foreign automakers, but a trimmer, better managed industry can emerge, allowing the survivors to fight smarter and with better products that consumers will want to purchase.
Trackbacks
- The Auto Writer - MyBlogLog
- Your page is now on StumbleUpon!
- Mitt Romney's Plan For Detroit : reddit.com
- A1-Webmarks - User MattK
- keegan.matt's Friends on Faves
- Mitt Romney’s Plan For Detroit : The Auto Writer - Mixx
13 Responses to “Mitt Romney’s Plan For Detroit”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.



November 24th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
Some pretty strong recommendations. Drop Chrysler. Seems like just the Makes that you mentioned would be enough to keep Chrysler going. That would be a major hit on the economy to loose that many jobs.
November 24th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Unfortunately, the automakers have much to be blamed for the position that they are in. Lousy deals with unions and taking forever to bring new products to the market are killers.
If they claim to be in such dire straits as they say they are, then throwing billions their way will not guarantee a come back. In fact, I can see GM coming back in six months time with their hands held out again. As a taxpayer, I don’t want to be in hock to failed businesses whether they are airlines, banks, or automotive companies.
I don’t think Jeep could survive on its own, thanks to stiff competition. Every automaker needs to sell globally and the weakest link for Chrysler is their puny overseas sales record. GM and Ford, in fact sell more cars overseas, giving them a better chance to survive for the long term. A restructured GM selling Cadillac, Chevrolet and Jeep might work while Ford/Lincoln or Ford/Volvo seems the best bet for the Blue Oval.
December 1st, 2008 at 8:06 am
I have to agree with him too. The industry is close to bust.
December 1st, 2008 at 2:17 pm
Ryan — This week will be telling for the fortunes of Ford, General Motors and Chrysler. All three automakers’ management will be meeting with the U.S. Congress to pitch their latest plans. I’m thinking that GM will divest itself of several of its U.S. brands while Ford may sell Volvo (more about that tomorrow).
In the meantime, Chrysler will probably end up being dissolved, with Jeep going to GM or some other interested party.
Regardless, I expect that the U.S. government will throw billions of dollars of loan money their way, adding more to our national debt. Oh, joy!
December 3rd, 2008 at 12:39 am
MattK,
you need to do less blog and little more reading to educate yourself.
you have sooo much to learn.
for starters read this article.
//www.businessweek.com/autos/autobeat/archives/2008/11/romney_on_auto.html
December 3rd, 2008 at 6:42 am
Thanks, b, for your comment.
I do a lot of reading and have kept up with this subject for months. I also meet with people who are “in the know” and others who aren’t vested in the industry.
David Kiley’s piece is his opinion on how things will play out. He seems more concerned about guaranteeing employee health care, then retooling operations to build cars better suited for the next decade.
BTW, I believe Ford has the best chance of surviving and am not completely opposed to lending the automaker some money. We’ll need to see what GM and Chrysler have to say for themselves as well. After all, it was their first performance before Congress — a poorly organized pitch if I ever heard one — that has done little to convince most people that the Big Three has a plan in place worth considering.
June 15th, 2009 at 10:56 am
Did Gm deserve the bailout? You Ask me I would say NO.. why? When Honda and Toyota were out inventing new cars, GM was busy boasting about its pride and Showing off its hungry hungry Daughter the Hummer